Friday, May 10, 2013

The Founding of Shimer College: A Tale of Two Tales

Frances Wood Shimer and Cindarella Gregory in 1869
 To anyone who has been associated with Chicago's Shimer College, the story of its founding is probably familiar: in May 1853, two young teachers, Frances Wood and Cindarella Gregory, came out from upstate New York to the tiny frontier town of Mount Carroll, Illinois, to start a "seminary" (not entirely unlike a high school) that had been chartered by the state legislature the year before. Nominally governed by a Board of Trustees but effectively run by the two teachers, the school moved into its own building in 1854. A few months after that, the struggling school was given up for dead by its Trustees, and placed fully into the hands of Misses Wood and Gregory.

That is the well-worn tale of how this plucky little college got its start. It is not wrong, and can be verified by consulting contemporary newspaper accounts, as well as the letters and journal of Miss Wood herself. But it isn't the only story.

The second story of Shimer's founding varies a bit, but goes something like this: The overambitious townspeople of Mount Carroll started a seminary in 1852, but were unable to get it off the ground -- a common pattern across the Old Northwest at this time. In 1853, completely independently, Misses Wood and Gregory arrived in town and started a private school. Their school prospered, and observing the teachers' administrative prowess, the despairing Trustees asked them to take over the Trustees' stillborn school; the teachers graciously accepted the charge.

To be sure, this second story is wrong. Wood and Gregory were part of the Mount Carroll Seminary from the very day (May 11, 1853) when they taught their first class. Yet we can find this story as far back as 1857, signed by none other than John Wilson, who had chaired the Board of Trustees during the school's difficult first months of operation. And we find it again, in 1869, in a report submitted to the Illinois Superintendent of Public Instruction-if not directly from the pen of Mrs. Shimer (née Wood) herself, surely at least prepared under her close supervision.

So, why is this utterly nonfactual story coming from such reliable sources?

We may find the beginning of the answer in a key distinction in 19th-century private education: between "venture" or "select" schools (often little more than one or two teachers hanging out a shingle) and "proper" state-chartered institutions overseen by boards of trustees. (For discussions of this, see e.g. Tolley 2002, Katz 1975.) Agency and gender come into this distinction as well: a select school would naturally be governed by its teacher or teachers, often female; but a proper seminary or college was governed by its almost invariably male trustees.

Thus, when the Trustees relinquished control in 1855, the Mount Carroll Seminary found itself in a treacherous position. Abandoned by its Board, it could only move forward under the direct governance of its teachers. Yet if it was perceived as merely a teacher-run school, it would soon lose the prestige it needed to survive and grow. It needed to somehow be both things at once: a joint proprietorship and a "proper" school working to the highest standard.

Understanding this contradiction, we can understand the two contradictory stories of Shimer's founding: if the narrator wanted to emphasize the prestige of being a proper state-chartered institution, the simple factual narrative served just fine. But when emphasizing the agency and authority of Misses Wood and Gregory, the second narrative served better - and for good measure, captured the real power dynamics of the first years much more accurately.


It is thus unsurprising that the second narrative first emerges in 1857, when the town was wracked by scandalous accusations against Wood and Gregory, and the Seminary's supporters needed to shore up their moral authority (for more on this, see Malkmus 2003).

There is an underlying tension here, between Shimer as an institution (embodied by the first narrative) and Shimer as the work of its people (embodied by the second narrative), that can be traced through all of the school's 160 years. From time to time - as in 1967, or 2010 - when things have become a little bit unbalanced, a crisis has ensued. In the present day specifically, the Trustees' legal authority stands in tension with the "moral suasion" exercised by Shimer's radically democratic Assembly. And just as with the two contradictory tales of Shimer's founding, we could construct two entirely contradictory (but equally accurate) accounts of the college as it exists today.

This suggests that Shimer's ability to strategically balance between two contradictory identities has played a key role in this tiny school's improbable 16-decade run. This may also help to explain why Shimer has also remained so very small for all these years: this kind of ambiguity becomes harder to sustain when expanding beyond the human scale.


Works mentioned

Saturday, April 20, 2013

Agenda for the Shimer College Assembly meeting of April 21, 2013



Meeting of the Shimer College Assembly

Sunday, April 21st, 2013:  4:00
Cinderella Lounge

AGENDA

Approval of the Minutes of March 17, 2013
              
Committee Reports (submitted ahead of time:  questions only):  15 minutes   

MOTIONS FROM THE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE:  20 minutes

I)

To be inserted into Section V of the Constitution:

Institutional Goals and Assessment Committee

The Institutional Goals and Assessment Committee represents the Shimer community as a whole in the setting of long-
term goals for the College and contributes to the composition and implementation of the College’s Strategic Plan. To this
end, the Committee:

1.Promotes ongoing, community-wide discussion of the identity, mission, and long-term objectives of the College.
2.On the basis of such discussion, identifies and recommends strategic goals for the College to pursue.
3.Disseminates its strategic goal recommendations to the Shimer community.
4.Presents its recommendations in writing to the committee that is periodically formed, at the initiative of the Board
of Trustees, to write or revise the Strategic Plan.
5. Includes general budgetary recommendations among its recommendations, to financially sustain and give due priority to the strategic goals it proposes or supports. Specific amounts for budget line items are not within the purview of the Committee.
6. Advises the President or other senior staff when they seek the sense and opinions of the community as a whole of strategic issues
7. Selects at least one Committee member to participate in the interviewing of candidates for senior administrative positions.
8. Assesses the progress of the College toward strategic goals:
a) Checks that departments and offices are assessing their progress toward strategic objectives.
b) Checks that such self-assessment is adequately informed by evidence.
c) Makes recommendations to departments and offices regarding their strategic self-assessment.
d) In the event that the Committee finds that strategic goals are not being adequately pursued, or progress toward them not adequately assessed, by one or more departments or offices, it may, at its discretion, bring the problem to appropriate authorities.
e) Shares in the responsibility for disseminating to the Shimer community, annually and on the basis of departmental and office strategic self-assessments, information regarding institutional progress toward long-term goals.

The Committee shall consist of: one member each from the Faculty and the administrative staff, two students, one internal member of the Board of Trustees, two members from the Assembly-at-large, and the President as member ex officio without a vote. In the event that no candidates are available for reserved constituency seats at the time of election, their seats may be filled by members from the Assembly-at-large. Members must have attended or been employed by Shimer College for at least one year, and students must be in good academic and social standing to serve. After the first election, members are elected for overlapping two-year terms at the first Assembly meeting of the spring semester. Trustees whose terms on the Board end during their term on the Committee cease to be members and are replaced by election. The Chairperson is elected by the Committee membership at its first meeting. When the Committee is without a Chairperson, the Committee is convened by the most senior member from the internal community.

II) Procedure for Plenary Elections of Committees Whose Members Serve Two-Year Overlapping Terms

At the first election of a committee whose members serve two-year overlapping terms, or in the event that all seats in such a committee are vacant, up to 60% of the members elected (four in the case of seven-member committees) may opt for one-year terms. If fewer than 40% (three in the case of seven-member committees) do so, additional members, selected in last-name alphabetical order, will have one-year terms until the proportion of single-year members reaches 40% of the total elected.

To be inserted after the first paragraph of section V of the Constitution:

III) To be inserted after the first paragraph of section V of the Constitution:

First election of New Committees

At the discretion of the Agenda Committee, the first election of a newly constituted Assembly committee may take place
at a time of the academic year different from the time prescribed in the committee’s constitutional description.


MOTION FROM THE FINANCIAL AID POLICY COMMITTEE:
5 minutes

That the Financial Aid Policy Committee remain as a body except for necessary replacements until elections in the spring of 2014.

Elections:

Speaker of the Assembly
Parliamentarian
Ombudsperson
Agenda Committee
APC
JAG
Student nominees to the Board of Trustees (students only)

Election to new committee if passed by the Assembly

Replacements on the Governance Committee
Replacements on the Financial Aid Policy Committee

Thursday, April 18, 2013

Shimer "financially responsible", feds say

In the State of the College address yesterday, president Susan Henking delivered the news that Shimer's composite financial responsibility score for the previous year was 1.82, bringing it over 1.5 for the first time in 3 years.

This has a considerable positive effect on the school's ability to receive federal financial aid, as detailed on the Department of Education website:
The composite score reflects the overall relative financial health of institutions along a scale from negative 1.0 to positive 3.0. A score greater than or equal to 1.5 indicates the institution is considered financially responsible.

Schools with scores of less than 1.5 but greater than or equal to 1.0 are considered financially responsible, but require additional oversight. These schools are subject to cash monitoring and other participation requirements
This is a significant accomplishment, especially given how thoroughly rigged this entire system is against small nonconformist schools like Shimer.  Kudos to all who helped to make this happen.

Tuesday, April 16, 2013

Prez Henking to give State of the College address Wednesday, 1 PM

Just a note that Shimer president Susan Henking will be giving the State of the College address in Cinderella Lounge at 1 PM this Wednesday, April 17.  Transcript and possibly video to be available thereafter.

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Agenda for Shimer College Assembly of March 17, 2013

Meeting of the Shimer College Assembly

Sunday, March 17, 2013:  3:30
Cinderella Lounge

AGENDA

Approval of the Minutes of November 14, 2012
              
Committee Reports*
    Administrative Committee
    Agenda Committee
    APC
    Budget Committee
    Financial Aid Committee
    QLC

Motion (from the Agenda Committee):
That all Assembly Officers except the Secretary and all committees which are not open to new students be elected in the Spring semester, effective after graduation of the year in which they are elected.

Motion:  (motivated by David Shiner):
The Administrative and Budget Committees are hereby suspended until such time as the Assembly votes to reinstate them.  If this suspension is not lifted within one year from today, those committees will be defunct.

Motions from the Governance Committee
Motion I. Institutional Goals and Assessment Committee
To be inserted into Section V of the Constitution:
The Institutional Goals and Assessment Committee represents the Shimer community as a whole in the setting of long-term goals for the College and contributes to the composition and implementation of the College’s Strategic Plan.  To this end, the Committee:

  1. Promotes ongoing, community-wide discussion of the identity, mission, and long-term objectives of the College.
  2. On the basis of such discussion, formulates strategic goals of the College. 

    3.    Presents a written proposal to the general committee that is periodically formed, at the initiative of the Board of Trustees, to write or revise the Strategic Plan. 

    4.    Makes general budgetary recommendations, to be included in the proposal, to financially sustain and give due priority to the strategic goals it proposes or supports.  Specific amounts for budget line items are not within the purview of the Committee.

  1. Advises the President or other senior staff when they seek the sense and opinions of the community as a whole on strategic issues
  2. At least one member of the Committee is to participate in the interviewing of candidates for senior administrative positions.
  3. Assesses the progress of the College toward strategic goals:
  1. Checks that self-assessment by departments and offices of their progress toward strategic objectives is taking place.
  2. Checks that such self-assessment is adequately informed by data.
  3. Makes recommendations to departments and offices regarding their strategic self-assessment.
  4. In the event that the Committee finds that strategic goals are not being adequately pursued, or progress toward them not adequately assessed, by one or more departments or offices, it will bring the problem to the Assembly.
  5. On the basis of departmental and office strategic self-assessments, produces and disseminates to the community a summary assessment of institutional progress toward long-term goals every other year.

Membership:  One member each from the Faculty and the administrative staff,  two students, one internal member of the Board of Trustees, one external member of the Board of Trustees, and one member from the Assembly-at-large.  In the event that no candidates are available for reserved Trustee or constituency seats at the time of election, their seats may be filled by members from the Assembly-at-large.  Students must have attended Shimer College for at least one year and be in good academic and social standing to serve.  After the first election, members are elected for overlapping two-year terms at the first Assembly meeting of the spring semester.  Trustees whose terms on the Board end during their term on the Committee cease to be members and are replaced by election. The Chairperson is elected by the Committee membership at its first meeting.   When the Committee is without a Chairperson, the Committee is convened by the most senior member from the internal community.

Motion II. Committee for Institutional Transparency           
To be inserted into Section V of the Constitution:

The Committee for Institutional Transparency ensures that the Shimer Community is well informed about the direction and administration of the College, and serves as a resource for members of the community who have questions concerning the direction and administration of the College.  
To carry out its mission, the Committee:
  1. Proactively inquires into the direction and administration of the College, as by reviewing documents, interviewing and corresponding with staff, or other means.
  2. Disseminates information about itself and its mission, at least once per semester.
  3. Disseminates information about the direction and administration of the College, at least once per semester, through written reports, newsletters, or other means.
  4. Creates opportunities, at least once per semester, for members of the community to become well-informed about the state of the College, through Fireside discussions, question and answer sessions with members of the staff, or other means.
  5. Solicits and considers requests from any member or members of the Shimer community that the Committee inquire into and report on a matter or issue identified by the community member or members.
Included in the purview of the Committee is direction and administration of the College by groups or persons, such as Assembly and Board Committees, which are not part of the administrative staff.
At its discretion, the Committee may elect to inform only a supervisor and/or the Speaker of the Assembly and/or the President about a particular matter or issue.
The Committee may not inquire into or disseminate information about matters that do not affect the direction and administration of the College, and complies with the Policy For Shimer College Publications adopted in August of 2003 and revised in March of 2005 insofar as the policy applies to the Committee’s activities.
The Committee respects the legitimate need for privacy and confidentiality, as in matters relating to the retention of personnel and other matters, in accordance with principle seven of the Declaration of Principles of Shared Governance at Shimer College, adopted by the Assembly on November 15, 2009, which reads in part: “When […] peril [to the College] or [liability] exposure actually exists, measures can and should be taken to protect the College while respecting its shared governance.  The nature of the invoked threat should be explained as specifically as the welfare of the College permits.”

Membership:  One member each from the Faculty and the administrative staff, three students, and two members from the Assembly-at-large.  Students must have attended Shimer College for at least one year and be in good academic and social standing to serve. After the first election, members are elected for overlapping two-year terms at the first Assembly meeting of the spring semester.  The Chairperson is elected by the Committee membership at its first meeting. When the Committee is without a Chairperson, the member with the most seniority at Shimer convenes the Committee, and a Chair is elected by the membership at the first meeting.


Motion 3:  Procedure for Plenary Elections of Committees Whose Members Serve Two-Year Overlapping Terms
To be inserted after the first paragraph of section V of the Constitution:

At the first election of a committee whose members serve two-year overlapping terms, or in the event that all seats in such a committee are vacant, up to 60% of the members elected (four in the case of seven-member committees) may opt for one-year terms. If fewer than 40% (three in the case of seven-member committees) do so, additional members, selected in last-name alphabetical order, will have one-year terms until the proportion of single-year members reaches 40% of the total elected.

Motion 4: First election of New Committees
To be inserted after the first paragraph of section V of the Constitution:

At the discretion of the Agenda Committee, the first election of a newly constituted Assembly committee may take place at a time of the academic year different from the time prescribed in that committee’s constitutional description.

Announcements

Adjournment


Note:  after the Assembly has voted upon David Shiner’s amendment, the remaining time until 6:00 will be spent in discussing the motions brought to us from the Governance Committee.  Note that these motions are only a part of that committee’s general charge, but they are motions which will affect our election processes and the running of the college and the assembly.  At 6:00, as speaker, I will stop the discussion to assess whether or not we are ready to vote upon any of these motions.  If so, we will proceed.  If not, we will identify for the Governance Committee those things which we would like to see in a different form and which would then be further discussed at a fireside.

Note:  all of the motions on this agenda are amendments to the Constitution.  As such, they need a 2/3 vote of those present.